SwiftAC : Clientside Anticheat against lua cheats

Whats the difference between this script and cakeanticheat ?

VCMod compatibility is fully fixed. ;) Thanks to Ley.

[NEW UNDETECTED HACK] pls detect this private hack used by one person k thanks

This guy can sure model and code a piano, tho. So I'll give a few points for that.. But your AC is damn annoying some times.

There's only 1 other somewhat big anticheat, no others are in dev :v. either way tho, because I can't be arsed to pm you, so it's easier to let my clients do it for me

My security is none of your concern. There are reasons why I don't put much effort into obfuscation and detouring checks. There are other protections in place.

You have any further issues, you come straight to me instead of devalueing my work to your clients behind my back. VCMod did not have any issues with other anti-cheats. No idea why this is so difficult for you to handle it.

Alright, being slightly pissed off aside. I am being serious, if you have any issues, I am always glad to chat. Thats a bit more productive than to talk behind my back until some mutual friend tells me about it, isin't it?

I had to modify my addon literally to log less, because otherwise, it would log/dump your whole "protected" code :v

well the DRM is shit, by overwriting RunString/RunStringEx the whole code of your addon can be dumped, so it's essentially a no brainer DRM

You know, calling others work "shit" just because you could not be arsed to write a proper Anti-Cheat is a bit of a "shit" thing to do.

Just my thoughts about this.. Adding you for a little chat.

The first one existed for as long as the old market existed, the second one existed for few months. I have a feeling you owned one before though because the avatar bears a strange resemblance, so there you go

You will not close this script as the past 2 anticheat when you collect a normal amount of money, you promise a long support script?

I don't think it's a good idea to make the ac easier to bypass just to make it compatible with the uneccessary things one other addon is doing, it has no need to use the debug library, it just uses them to name hooks, you can literally remove the calls and his script would work just the same.

casino kit is retarded, it uses the debug library even though it shouldn't in a file called cl_tdui.lua you should tell the creator of it to stop using the debug library for stuff like hook names

It would help more if you could provide more details in the version instead of "some bug". I am waiting for a fix I think there is a complication with the Casino Kit scripts because SAC kicks everyone from the server when they join saying they are cheating.

nah cba to put one up and dk any

Could you do a test server or give the ip a couple of clients that use anti-cheat your for testing to protect against cheating, it would be helpful for identity work. Also wanted to learn C++, it does not block the same?

I don't need/want to, this isn't HAC :v: There's a hook you can hook when you want to suppress bans though, which gives you info about the detection and the player. you could hook that, suppress the ban and use your own ban routine instead which e.g. does the "terribly cruel punishment" you wrote above

and while I could detect citizen, the issue is it isn't worth updating ACs all the time for every single cheat

note the word of the usage try, cac doesn't detect 100% of cheats either, try citizenhack for example :v

99% this is a strong statement and a block if he Privat cheats for money? If I can throw a link to cheats private to you in PM, can buy to protest, but something tells me ,no.

cac tries to cover everything while being obsecure, this one lays the cards open and tries to detect 99% of stuff instead of 100%

I wanted to know, he is better than cac-cheat? Or is it worse and cheaper*?

also include the error

well you're experiencing a lua error :s:s:s, make a support ticket, and include the violation